On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Julian Foad wrote: > It seems *awfully* redundant given that there is already the Id *and* > the geographical location. I have difficulty imagining that a high > enough proportion of these will be determined and maintained to make it > worthwhile. I do see why you want it though, and agree it would be nice > to be able to get a list of airports in "my" region, by name of region > rather than by lat/lon.
It's awfully time consuming to determine the continents on the fly though, rather than simply searching for a particular key. > Yep, lovely. Those two look good to me. The problem there is that we don't need to keep a list of windsock locations in RAM all the time. *YES* we need the data - I'm just not convinced that that's the place to put it. -- Jon Stockill [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
