* David Luff -- Wednesday 17 March 2004 12:22: > On an (almost) totally unrelated note, I think it would be a good idea to > test unknown options against aircraft names, so that, for instance, > bin/fgfs --T38 would work to bring up the T38. Would patches to add this > be accepted?
Urks. That would totally break Unix semantics. Options are options. Make that $ fgfs T38 I've always thought that it would be nice if fgfs would accept one optional argument that would start it in a "situation". For example, one could make a file ~/.fgfs/situation/rescue that contains definitions to start with a bo105 (parked on a hospital helipad; doors open; engines off) or ~/.fgfs/situation/carrier etc. This would then be started as $ fgfs carrier. OTOH, one could easily do this with a wrapper ... OK, I convinced myself and I'll implement this in my fgfs starter script *now* ... :-) m. _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
