Lee Elliott said: > I think a survey would be a good idea, for the same reason I suggested > something like a wiki for doing it - without making sure that every > possibility is in some way catered for some things could be excluded or > impossible. > > I don't hold any strong opinions about it really - just things that have > occurred to me while developing & testing FG a/c, but a complete re-mapping > might, or might not be a good idea - I just don't think that all the > requirements have been identified yet and until then any progress or > decisions are likely to miss something. >
Oh, well that's just a jaded programmer responding to the word "comprehensive" :-). What I should have said is that a proposal and RFC on the list would be better for me as a format. Maybe not for others... Best, Jim _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
