On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 21:12:01 +0000 Lee Elliott wrote: >On Friday 07 January 2005 07:35, Chris Metzler wrote: >>On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 19:48:27 +0200 Paul Surgeon wrote: >>> It would be really nice if the level of development was >>> listed as well as a brief description about the aircraft. >>> That would help people decide whether they really want to >>> download the aircraft or not. >>> >>> For example : >>> ------------------- >>> Development level : Beta >>> Description : This Airbus XYZ was built in 19xx. >>> 2000 of them were build before production stopped in 19xx. >>> Please note that the hydraulic system is not fully >>> operational at this stage. >> >> I think this is a good idea. Even if it's just at the >> "alpha"/"beta"/ "finished" level. > > Wasn't this addressed via the <status> tag in the set files?
Yes. But that doesn't directly help the potential downloader of an
aircraft, since they can't look at that info without first downloading
the aircraft -- unless it's incorporated into Curt's webpage somehow,
which is what Paul suggested.
-c
--
Chris Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(remove "snip-me." to email)
"As a child I understood how to give; I have forgotten this grace since I
have become civilized." - Chief Luther Standing Bear
pgp6Uny4IXegA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
