-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Giles Robertson schrieb: > 1) Fgrun/fgfs. > For the average windows user, this is *highly* counterintuitive. In so > far as Windows has an overarching user interface and tool design > philosophy, it's integration. The concept of a GUI that launches the > program doesn't make sense to them; they expect to be able to run > flightgear, and for it to present a menu that reads something like "New > flight"/"Saved Flight"/"Options"/"Exit". I'm not saying this is the way > we should go, but I'd like to note that many users, when presented with > the current method, get *very* confused, especially by the absence of a > flight planner. Many also find restarting FlightGear in order to change > aircraft counterintuitive
The first point is argueable. But that we need a restart just to change planes is a big show stopper! Your other points are valid. But none are thus counterintuitive than the need to restart FGFS. CU, Christian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFB8NRUlhWtxOxWNFcRAphiAKCV0GNXaKkeU5qVRex8FDJtvntPNwCgsg5Q /oeR83fj089dFTSe1B2eIGQ= =bsh8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
