* Curtis L. Olson -- Wednesday 11 May 2005 18:34: > I think this is a very minor issue
Agreed. I wouldn't have asked if I had thought that this even is a controversial topic. I though it's clear which of both are preferred by the majority of *users*. Developers don't have that 'problem', anyway. Editing $FG_ROOT/preferences.xml is one way. I only wanted to get rid of my local changes there out of egotism. (It makes committing other things easier, if you don't have to back out local modifications. :-) But now I've created my $FG_ROOT/Nasal/local.nas which does this for me (and doesn't get in the way when committing. Some nasal knowledge is all you need.) > So I'll add my yes vote to the view order swapping idea. Hmmm ... m. PS: and that's local.nas. Does anyone find the triple-ternary frightening? stepView = func(step) { curr = getprop("/sim/current-view/view-number"); views = props.globals.getNode("/sim").getChildren("view"); if (step == 1) { curr = curr == 0 ? 2 : curr == 2 ? 1 : curr == 1 ? 3 : curr + 1; } elsif (step == -1) { curr = curr == 3 ? 1 : curr == 1 ? 2 : curr == 2 ? 0 : curr - 1; } if (curr < 0) { curr = size(views) - 1; } elsif (curr >= size(views)) { curr = 0; } setprop("/sim/current-view/view-number", curr); } settimer(func { view.stepView = stepView }, 0); _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d