> directly. We aren't trying to eventually replace JSBsim with a > proprietary flight dynamics model here so please, I don't want anyone to > worry. :-) <cough>Jon</cough> :-) My main goal for attending this show > was to show the flexibility and adaptability of FlightGear as an > engineering and rapid prototyping tool. I think FlightGear will have a > big future in that area.
At $1900 for a commercial license for Matlab (only Matlab - not simulink) it's no surprise that some are bypassing Matlab. It's obviously a great tool with a well-established history, but there are some alternatives in the Open Source world (SciLab/SciCos, IIRC). Also, I'm working on JSBSim Commander, which will make using JSBSim with flight controls development a little more fun, if not useful and practical for broader uses. I think it's great that FlightGear is getting so much attention from commercial partnerships. It helps/benefits us all. JSBSim has lately been adding 2 or 3 people per week to the mailing list, so that's encouraging. The newsletter also publishes the new and innovative ways that JSBSim is being used in industry. There's a place for everyone ... Jon _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
