On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:20:38 +0200, Erik wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Andy Ross wrote: > > > Basically, it seems to me like these guys are fine, with a few > > nit-picky exceptions like the joystick configuration. I don't think > > Yes, but why the joystick configuration and not the sound > configuration (which was created by me for the c172) for instance. > > > we need to raise a stink, except to get their derived stuff released > > as a separate tarball somewhere. ..hey, give Augusto some time to get this fixed, eh? ;o) ..Augusto, if you need any help with winning your team over to the GPL, just holler. ;o) > I would really like to see it available. But they claim copyright over > work done by someone else (and also restrict it afterwards). To me > they just have to say which files where modified and that those files > still fall under the terms of the GPL. ..diff's, anyone? ;o) ..keep in mind _some_ of our stuff like trivial header files, does not qualify as copyrightable, simply because there are only "so many ways" "to get 4 outta 2-n-2." .._lots_ of background on this over at Groklaw.net. ;o) -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [email protected] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
