> From: Erik Hofman
> 
> Jim Wilson wrote:
> >>From: Erik Hofman
> 
> >>Which they do, they clearly added modified versions of FlightGear 
> >>configuration files to the systems and sound directory.
> >>
> >>If they want us to respect their copyright I expect them to respect ours 
> >>and make clean which versions are derived from FlightGear and hence are 
> >>still GPL.
> > 
> > Actually what you are suggesting they do isn't exactly correct.  Just 
> > identifying the changed files is not sufficient.  See
> clause 2b in the GPLv2.  Derived works _must_ also be GPL.
> > 
> > Essentially, to do this right, the original model with textures and 
> > animations would have to go into a separate zip file
> that is licensed as is and then the derived configuration files would go into 
> another zip file that is GPL'd.
> 
> You can always argue what would be derived work: just the modified files 
> or the complete package. Personally I would say the first.
> 

It does not matter, files or package.  Only part of the published material must 
be derived in order for that published material be required to be released 
under GPLv2.  The license is very clearly worded: "You must cause any work that 
you distribute or publish, that in whole or in part contains or is derived from 
the Program or any part thereof, to be licensed as a whole at no charge to all 
third parties under the terms of this License."

The published archive (MB339-PAN.zip) is derived from "any part thereof" the 
FlightGear program.  Sure, you can split hairs over wheather you can publish 
two separately licensed works in the same archive file.  I am not trying to be 
nitpicky, just clear.  It certainly seems that the logical thing to do is 
distribute the non-GPL original artwork and configurations in a seperate zip 
file.  It would be the clearest and simplest way to avoid misunderstandings now 
and in the future.

About misunderstandings,  note that they can go both ways.  It would not be 
surprising for someone to mis-interpret the license files in the zip and 
erroneously modify and release under GPL some of the non-GPL parts of the 
339-PAN project.  You could have a few generations of derivation in circulation 
before someone realized that there was a problem.

Best,

Jim



_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d

Reply via email to