Gerhard Wesp wrote:
> Well, what's GLXPbufferSGIX?  I'm not familiar with the OpenGL
> naming conventions, but it definitely sounds like an unsupported
> extension being used here.

OpenGL extensions are queriable at runtime, so it won't actually be
used.  But the types and function signatures required by those
extensions must be available at compile time.

Andy

_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d

Reply via email to