On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 00:49:14 -0600, you wrote: >Of course - which is where the Wiki comes in as I see it. Up to date >information that's very easily kept that way... Not a replacement for the >conventional docs, but I do feel the link on the FG website could be slightly >more prominent - even folk who were actively looking for it have failed to >find it.
The wiki would be very useful place for users to find up to date, if incomplete, help with issues that are too recent or changing to make it into official documentation. If the content stays relevant long enough, the wiki can become the basis for the official documents, as in this case. It would be helpful if common ways of working with FlightGear and ways of resolving issues were posted to the wiki, even in incomplete form, they would be a big help to those new to FlightGear. A good example is the autopilot confusion. If I have time, I can add something on that today. Or for example, that it is okay to use the 0.9.8 scenery with the 0.9.9 release---something that can take much longer to update on the official website than a wiki page. Steve _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
