> > So I'm unsure if it is a good idea to include those patches.
>
> They are harmless, but according to what Melchior has pointed out, some of
> the code (what I added to the exceptions classes) is redundant (basically,
> what is written there is auto-generated by the compiler unless it has
> problems). For the other parts of the patch, it is still relevant.
> I'm going to rework it later by eliminating the above redundancy when
> I have time (probably this weekend).
Actually, I've looked at them now myself, and I ask the patching powers
that be to apply it, save for the redundant parts patching the files
SimGear/source/simgear/structure/exception.cxx
and
SimGear/source/simgear/structure/exception.hxx
for which Melchior has voiced rightful objection.
The 2nd revision of the patch is just a cleanup of some exception
throwing and catching, sometimes providing additional diagnostics
(e.g., the mysterious "Failed to open file" is now augmented
with the actual file location caught).
Vassilii
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
