On Sunday 29 January 2006 15:34, Josh Babcock wrote: > Durk Talsma wrote: > > > > I'm wondering though if there would be any future need for airway > > information inside FlightGear itself, for example in modeling GPS > > receivers or flight management computers. If so, it would still be > > worthwhile to convert the data into a native format that could much more > > rapidly be loaded into flightgear. > > > > It would always be nice info to have. For instance, it would allow > people to play with those advanced HUDs that show visual representations > of airways and ILS approaches. > I agree, but for display purposes just loading a memory image of the Robin Peel database would probably suffice. I.e. there wouldn't be a need for setting up an intricate network of nodes and connections as I'm currently doing for the ground network. Therefore, I'm considering loading the airway data straight into flightgear, while preserving the networked version for a flightplan utility.
Cheers, Durk ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
