> Thanks for the file. It fixed the seg fault. > But C172R seems to suffer the same lower-than-RL max RPM as C172P (2200 > vs 2400), and as such cannot climb at the expected rate.
> Do they share some engine spec file that may have been modifed recently? > Yavuz Onder I don't think so. I've got a fresh build from a couple of days ago (from FlightGear CVS). I'm showing no differences between my base package and CVS for the aircraft and propulsion. Using the default startup: fgfs --timeofday=noon I get 2500 rpm and >1000 fpm climb rate off the runway at 70 kts. I don't know how close that is to actual. Jon ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
