> Martin Spott wrote: > > "gh.robin" wrote: > > > >> With FlightGear-0.9.11-pre1 it is something strange > >> we have Flying Carriers. > > > > The carrier is correct - sea level is wrong :-)) > > Wait for the tide to come in. > > Jon > I presume this is to do with the fact that the sea is modelled as a few huge flat polys whose surfaces have a significant "altitude" change between the centres and the vertices.
AFAIK this has not changed since the very early days of FG, but since we now all have graphics cards that are 2-3 orders of magnitude faster than when FG started, is now the time to increase the number of polys in the ocean? A reduction in the edge length of a factor of 3 would reduce the surface height variation by a factor of ~3, and increase the poly count in the ocean by a factor of 9, which I believe should be acceptable. Unfortunately, I have no idea where so start poking around in the codebase to do this though. Richard ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
