On Sunday 07 October 2007 13:15, Durk Talsma wrote: > Gentlemen, > > Is there any reason not to use snprintf instead of sprintf? In order to > investigate possible memory corruption errors, I changed a few in SimGear, > and just found there are about another 250 of these in FlightGear. Unless > there's a compelling reason, I'd like to change those as well, and commit > this. >
Well, since I got exactly zero responses to my question, I assume that nobody objected. I committed a first stab of replacements in SimGear (plib branch only; will do SimGear / OSG later). Cheers, Durk ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
