Hi Curt! Curtis Olson wrote: > It's been a long time but I believe the original intent of the code is that > precision and non-precision runways should have threshold markings, while > visual runways should not have them. By my best recollection, this is how > the code was designed and by my reading of the code, that is the way it > still works.
OK, maybe I misread the code. Wouldn't lines 216-236 in rwy_visual.cxx generate a small threshold marking? Would that be 14ft in length (from 14/length)? I haven't checked this on any specific airport, but I looked into the code due to Martin's question (top of this thread) about the markings included in the "Visual" marking type. Cheers, Ralf ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
