gerard robin wrote: > On vendredi 21 novembre 2008, Tim Moore wrote: >> Csaba Halász wrote: >>> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 1:00 PM, gerard robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> ... >> >>>> Could not find at least one of the following objects for animation: >>>> >>>> I guess that is due to the recent update of FG CVS with Nasal ? which >>>> unfortunately include Boost ( and not useful for the moment ) >>> No, this is due to Melchior's change in props.nas, see his mail >>> earlier. I believe that is entirely in the data tree, no c++ changes. >>> >>>> How can i built FG with these recent update and without Boost ? >> You don't, you build it with Boost. >> 1) cvs update >> 2) run autogen.sh >> 3) configure. If configure doesn't find a recent enough version of Boost, >> 3a) download a recent version from Boost.org, build and install it >> 3b) run configure again >> 4) build flightgear >> >> If there is really a problem here, let us know. >> Tim > Hello Tim > There won't be any problem, but i heard that a more recent not stable OSG > version was necessary. > If it is the case that is the problem. > I've just checked in simgear and flightgear changes that should remove the dependency on OSG 2.7.3. Having said that... > Until we don't have the next OSG stable version. > Do i have to freeze every model development ? I don't think OSG 2.7.3, 2.7.5, or OSG SVN for that matter are unstable in terms of introducing new bugs in ordinary usage.. There is a lot of development activity in OSG, and sometimes interfaces change. Are you unhappy because you need to build OSG from source?
There are often bug fixes and features in OSG SVN that make a real difference to fg; sometimes they are even submitted by members of the FlightGear community. I presume that you run FlightGear CVS because you want all the latest goodies; well, so do I :) A valid point would be that we are preparing for a release, and a release should depend on the last released OSG. But there have been tens of thousands of lines of changes in OSG since 2.6. I think it is more realistic to time our release with that of OSG 2.8. > > Or is it really possible to avoid Boost, (if we want) during that transition > period ? > Does the "--with-boost" means that we could build with or without boost ? No, it's just for specifying a path to the Boost installation. If you supply --with-boost=no, your compilation will fail. Tim ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
