BARANGER Emmanuel wrote: > James Sleeman wrote : > >> In short, there are plenty of aircraft out there I believe that ARE easy >> to fly in real life, and just saying that the "best models" with "higher >> quality" can never be "easy to fly" is a wholly incorrect statement. > Everything is explained here. Thanks James.
In fact, I've spent way too many hours to make the F-16 easy to fly, just because it is in real live.. (And it's not done by changing the flight dynamics but by counter acting on the results of the flight dynamics. So I've actually had to make the aircraft more advanced to make it easier to fly). About the discussion (a bit), I can understand that the aircraft in the default base package are such that it's easier to get them airborne. That means either one of two things; an easy startup procedure or a good guide to be able to get it in flyable state quite easily. And please don't be offended when an aircraft is not present or gets removed from the default base package. There is only room for very few aircraft and at this time not one of mine is present for example. Erik ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
