Hi, On Tuesday 07 April 2009 09:28:07 Erik Hofman wrote: > Maybe it's a good idea to let Tim include the code to support > array-nodes without using it anywhere yet (or provide a patch). That way > we can look (and feel) how it is going to work. do some small tests > ourselves and make decisions based on our own experience rather than on > theoretical assumptions. I can live well with that. To state more clear: I would vote for the array solution. since I read in this discussion that this appears to show up as a route that is sufficient for Tim and where most of us can live with.
Greetings Mathias ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
