Stuart Buchanan wrote: > Tim Moore wrote: >> I'm trying to give your generic approach a chance. > > I may be mis-interpreting your words, but if this means you're actively > investigating coding your new changes without vectors, then you deserve > many heartfelt thanks for putting extra effort to accommodate others in this, > whatever the outcome. > > I very much appreciate it.
I agree. And not just that, it separates this discussion from the configurable shader animation code which is a good step. Erik ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
