On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 12:33 PM, George Patterson <
george.patter...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Martin Spott <martin.sp...@mgras.net>
> wrote:
> > Pete Morgan wrote:
> >
> >> can you file this bug formally at
> >> http://code.google.com/p/flightgear-bugs/issues/list
> >> so we can track it
> >
> > I agree with Tim on the idea of trying to keep "feature requests" off
> > the "bug"-list. Otherwise we'll soon end up in a situation where nobody
> > cares about the bug tracker because _real_ bugs are going to be
> > difficult to identify among the pile of personal favourite requests
> > being dumped there.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Martin.
>
> I tend to agree, the Google code issue tracker lumps everything in
> together. There doesn't seem to be an easy way to separate them out. I
> have only had a cursory look over the options though.
>
> You have a lot of flexibility with the search options. You can restrict
the display to show only the labels you want. This would be more useful if
there weren't already a large number of labels; these should probably be
reduced to 10 categories or so. Whether or not John Denker deserves his own
label is debatable :)
Tim
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace,
Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW
http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
