James, you get my vote for hero of the day! Thank you! -Gary aka Buckaroo
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 6:30 PM, James Turner <[email protected]> wrote: > http://code.google.com/p/flightgear-bugs/issues/detail?id=99 > > describes (rather briefly, but the linked forum posts give more flavour) some > broken behaviour caused by refactoring in FGViewer during the 2.0 development > timeframe. The viewer damping code (which is a horrible piece of logic) was > subtly sensitive to the ordering of recalc / update calls, and as a result > any view with damping would not work correctly in 2.0 - noticeably, in the > chase view which some people apparently use a large portion of the time. > > I've committed a fix, such that the damping should work regardless of the > order of update/recalculation of the view. Any and all testing of view > behaviour after this commit would be greatly appreciated. > > Regards, > James ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
