On 19/07/10 11:06, James Turner wrote:
>
> On 19 Jul 2010, at 09:04, Scott Hamilton wrote:
>
>>     In the long term, I'd like to see being able to also get FIXES, VOR and 
>> NDB information from Nasal based on a range (and possibly; range and 
>> heading), that could be quite useful for the increasing number of "glass 
>> cockpits" I think.
>>     If anyone is thinking of writing such a Nasal extension, then please 
>> also give thought to this as well.
>
> Yep, I am aware there's a whole range of data that should be exposed, and a 
> huge amount of cockpit / FMS / GPS functions that can be moved to Nasal if 
> that were done. The geodetical functions in Nasal could also use some love, 
> in that case, to make navigation work in Nasal easier - basically a smarter 
> wrapper around SGGeod and the functions in SGGeodesy.
>
> As always, the problem is time -and also the lag of me coding up new 
> functions (which is quite easy) to a release, so that they're generally 
> available to end-users, is quite long - yet another reason for a faster 
> release cycle :)
>
> James
Does any of this look like it could be part of a GSoC project for next year?
Anybody care to write a very brief synopsis of where this fits, what 
benefits we'd get from fixing it and a vague stab in the dark about 
expected timescales for a Comp Sci undergraduate or similar to accomplish?

Also if we fix this, what other areas does this open up?

Remember however if this becomes a GSoC project, not a line of code will 
be written before May 2011  ;-(

Best Regards
Willie


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to