Martin Spott wrote: > Curtis Olson wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Martin Spott wrote: > > > >> Hi, the page: > >> > >> http://www.flightgear.org/announce.html#v2.0.0 > >> > >> says: "Version 2.0.0 [...] is primarily a bug fix release". I don't > >> think this holds true ;-) > >> > > > > I'm open to suggestions for more appropriate verbiage. :-) > > Well, in case of doubt I'd probably just ask those people, who decided > that > it's been worth incrementing the major release number for this very relase > - > they should know best ;-) >
This is yesterday's question. Perhaps today's question should be: "What should we call the next release? And when is it planned?" I think that it might be considered that the differences (at least in the visual aspects) between 2.0.0 and the current Git/Head already exceed those between 1.9.1 and 2.0.0. Vivian ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
