On 20 Nov 2010, at 18:00, James Turner wrote: > 2) I'm only proposing one non-backwards compatible change - the removal of > tie/untie, and probably not in the next twelve months - certainly not the > next six. I just checked and the JSBSim code makes extremely limited use of > tie(), in a couple of source tiles total. If you'd rather not use the new > property features, that's fine - it'll just mean more boilerplate code to use > the existing APIs when tie() does finally cease to exist. > > (And you can carry on shipping a version of props.hxx/.cxx with > JSBSim-standalone, that *does* include tie(), to avoid breaking existing > users who might have tie in their code)
Anders point out my checking was flawed - since tie() gets renamed to Tie() - doh. Since I assume changing every JSBSIm use of Tie() is a non-starter, we'll have to devise something special on the FG side, to keep tie() 'apparently' working for JSBSim - not ideal, but probably doable. Anyway, something for the future! Regards, James ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
