Heiko Schulz wrote:
> As we all know the truth behind it should be clear for all that there
> are copyright infringements clearly visible?
I doubt.
> Even if they can take FGFS and sell it due to our licence, they are
> not allowed to say that they developed the things they mentioned.
They're posting false claims on a website and/or -forum and some of
their poor customers are paying for it. "We" do not even suffer from
any material damage, therefore I assume it would be rather tricky to
develop a legal case just out of a few false statements.
> Our developers still have the Copyright, an no one other than us is
> allowed to claim copyright for.
Yup. Anyhow everyone here is free to start doing the dirty groundwork
which would be a requirement for making a legal case.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not happy about these scam's, but I suspect it
doesn't pay to get after them because a) it would cost you man-months
to lay the foundation for a legal case, b) they're a moving target and
therefore 'a)' is probably never coming to an end c) I think The
FlightGear Project is better off spending the time on doing their own
homework.
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks
Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand
malware threats, the impact they can have on your business, and how you
can protect your company and customers by using code signing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
