I don't see any reason for such, as it would need users to completely
rebuild all airports.
Using current x-plane's apt.dat format, would give us instantly thousands
of high quality airports ready to use from FS9/X and X-Plane!Even photo
sceneries would need this?
--- On Tue, 1/18/11, Peter Sadrozinski <psadrozin...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
From: Peter Sadrozinski <psadrozin...@bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] modern X-Plane airport format; Was: Magnetic
North
To: "FlightGear developers discussions" <flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Date: Tuesday, January 18, 2011, 7:55 PM
I'm up for experimentation.
I think the customized texture approach holds the most promise. I had
already looked into some of the tools that mapnik uses to generate on
the fly graphics for its tiles. I can try a quick and dirty run to get
some numbers for texture size vs texture clarity, and whatnot.
Pete
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks
Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand
malware threats, the impact they can have on your business, and how you
can protect your company and customers by using code signing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks
Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand
malware threats, the impact they can have on your business, and how you
can protect your company and customers by using code signing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
