On 13.02.2011 14:59, Martin Spott wrote: > Will check. Last time I looked at the proposed change for EDDL it > seemed to me that the requested 'fix' was inappropriate because the > tower positions was correct. Therefore I'm a bit cautions when people > submit Scenery-related bug-reports and declare their own reports as > "Accepted" at the same time, without review from any other person ;-)
Ok, thanks Martin! You're right, the original position mentioned in the tracker wasn't quite correct. But the current FG tower position is still wrong. However, it's just the view position which needs to be adapted - the visible tower model is already placed correctly. I checked the coordinates with Google Earth (not sure that counts as a proof though :) ). The position in the files attached in the tracker match the Google positions (which in the case of EDDL match the model position). EGLL is still missing a visible tower model. Anyone interested in taking care of England's main airport? cheers, Thorsten ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
