Hi,
>This smells strongly of a case where we like our policy better when it's >>applied to others and not ourselves. I'm not saying there isn't some >>logical explanation that I'm totally missing, I'm just saying what it >smells >like to me. Myself wasn't aware of that we have other models with the RD-logo as well. I'm not sure if Oliver, the starter of this debate is. But if so, I can understand that Jack is pissed off- and yes, to be consequent we would have to remove them as well. The whole thing "Repaints-Copyrights-trademarks" isn't very logical. It is like so much in real life: you are allowed to do anything, as long noone sees it. Or better: If there's no claimant, there's no judge. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
