On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 01:57 -0500, Chris O'Neill wrote: > I'm no lawyer, and I'm certainly not up on the law around the world, but > there's a concept in North American common law that one must take > "reasonable and prudent" steps to avoid liability. With this concept in > mind, I respectfully ask whether it is "reasonable and prudent" to > explicitly take the position that we'll "look the other way" when a > possible copyright infringements are occurring? Likewise, is the "if we > don't ask permission they can't say no" position reasonable and prudent?
To be honest I don't see any legal difference between creating an accurate livery for a virtual aircraft or publishing a photograph of the real aircraft. Erik ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Free Software Download: Index, Search & Analyze Logs and other IT data in Real-Time with Splunk. Collect, index and harness all the fast moving IT data generated by your applications, servers and devices whether physical, virtual or in the cloud. Deliver compliance at lower cost and gain new business insights. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
