On Thursday 07 April 2011 10:52:54 Ron Jensen wrote:
> The problem is in the definition of KVUO in apt.dat. It is specified as
> having non-precision markings, but there is not room for those marking. It
> should have basic marking instead. The runway is 3263 feet minus 762 feet
> for the overrun so its only 2500 feet left for the runway. We need
> something like 2600 feet to draw non-precision markings.
>
> 1     25 0 0 KVUO PEARSON FLD
> - 10  45.620454 -122.656491 08x  98.220  3263 0000.0762 0000.0000   60
> 231331 01 0 2 0.25 0 0300.0300 + 10  45.620454 -122.656491 08x  98.220 
> 3263 0000.0762 0000.0000   60 231331 01 0 1 0.25 0 0300.0300
>
> http://data.x-plane.com/file_specs/Apt810.htm#RwyMarkingCodes

BTW, the aerial views at 
http://www.bing.com/maps/?cp=45.620453|-122.656488&style=h&lvl=17&v=1
And
http://mpmap02.flightgear.org/?ll=45.6204,-122.656&z=17
both show basic markings and
http://www.airnav.com/airport/KVUO says basic markings as well.

Ron

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Xperia(TM) PLAY
It's a major breakthrough. An authentic gaming
smartphone on the nation's most reliable network.
And it wants your games.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-sfdev
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to