On Saturday, October 15, 2011 02:41:15 PM TDO_Brandano - wrote:
> Really, couldn't we just split off all the aircrafts to a separate SVN
> repository? Or to several GIT repositories? That way they could be checked
> out individually. I don't think we need the level of detailed history that
> GIT provides when it comes to aircraft data, and that way it would be
> possible for the Flightgear frontends to grab the aircrafts dynamically,
> if not even FGFS itself when using the multiplay protocol. And a developer
> should not need to download EVERY aircraft that was ever made for FGFS,
> One aircraft to test FGFS itself would be enough in most cases, and when
> checking aircraft specific issues it's a quick job updating only the one
> plane under exam.
>
> Cheers,
> Alessandro
I don't think one aircraft is enough to test FGFS with. Too many differences
between these aircraft. YASim vs. JSBSim and vastly different use of Nasal are
just two examples. But I think it should be possible to test everything in
FGFS with perhaps 8 or10 aircraft and there is definitly no need to have every
aircraft in GIT for this testing. So the basis idea that we don't need all of
the aircraft in GIT for testing is correct.
Hal
>
> > Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 23:33:14 +0200
> > From: flightg...@sablonier.ch
> > To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] GIT
> >
> > Am 15.10.11 22:41, schrieb Christopher Baines:
> > > I know of another project who's main git repository contains a script,
> > > that manages the other git repositories, this allows them to split the
> > > gigs of data they have in to more sensible chunks, without having to
> > > pull every repository individually.
> > >
> > > Though the current state will be annoying for new developers on average
> > > speed internet connections as afaik, git cannot clone, stop half way,
> > > then continue.
> >
> > Looks like we have to live with a mix of clueless git experience and
> > personal preferences of some administrators ?
> >
> > Cheers, Yves
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ----- All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
> > contains a definitive record of customers, application performance,
> > security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data
> > and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct
> > _______________________________________________
> > Flightgear-devel mailing list
> > Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
