Hi Roland,
What I am proposing is a Tower Control Simulator for the Controller and not
the Pilot.
Typically in such cases one or more "pilots" will control several airplanes
according to instructions provide to them from the controller.
Depending on the type of control different instructions might be given and
so forth.
Some of the features should be the following
a) ability to control multiple airplanes
By Control I mean the following but not limited to heading, cleared
altitude/level, rate of climb/descent, heading to a waypoint, instruct
plane to perform a specific instrument approach procedure or proceed
visually if requested by pilot, force a go-around, the plane should be able
to land on its own.
b) ability to control vehicles in the airport, ie simulate runway
incursions , maintenance work etc
c) simulate emergencies unusual situations ie, flapless approach, engine
failure, bird strike etc
Anyway the above is not a complete list of what a proper tower simulator
should be from the controllers perspective but as a proof of concept i
would say that A and B are a must.
Regards,
Efty
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Roland Häder <[email protected]> wrote:
> Aren't the ATC models not enough? E.g. the ATC-ML [1] which is enhanced
> by "jomo" is quite good.
>
> Regards,
> Roland
>
> [1]: http://www.emmerich-j.de/FGFS/index.html
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> RSA(R) Conference 2012
> Save $700 by Nov 18
> Register now
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
> _______________________________________________
> Flightgear-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
