Am 06.11.11 17:56, schrieb Heiko Schulz: > Hello, > >> Ouch ? > > This was regarding about your statement about the 4-5replacements/additionals > and maybe I'm wrong, but I think I can read something between your lines. > > You are not happy with the conversion to .dds-files, right, though you didn't > spoke out yet ?
To be clear, I am really happy with .dds and all the new possibilities we get for a better graphics for models and the scenery. A-n-y-t-i-m-e ! ;-) But I didn’t spoke out what Gary, Jacob and Anders write here. This is exactly what I meant and it was no vote against every improvement of the old shaders where I contributed too. Me and myself would be very happy when we get a directory structure with origins (maybe still png’s, state: "before compressing") and with deployed .dds files. For models, aircrafts and scenery textures. And when I think that i.e. in one HANGAR you can have only ONE src/dev directory for all your origins, but I will stop now ... I made a small test, taking the crop.dds (20.3 MB here): - crop.xcf (51.2 MB) - crop.xcf.zip (24.6 MB) - crop.png (14.5 MB) Cheers, Yves ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
