On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 09:25 +0100, Vic Marriott wrote: > Hi, > > More and more, the FG forums are showing that the most recent improvements, > added to the existing code, are too memory consuming for operation on > anything less than a high powered, up-to-date, well equipped computer. > > Though I, and probably most other FG users, am delighted that improvements > from your efforts continue at such a rate, can I please ask the hard-core > developers to give some thought to making the current set of bells and > whistles more memory friendly. > > There is little more frustrating than to read about the marvellous additions, > but then being unable to run them without FG slowing down to unusable levels. > > There is only so much users can do to keep their computers as up-to-date as > possible, but simple things like the lack of funds can easily put a limit on > that. > > Please consider having a concerted effort towards making FG less memory > hungry.
It's probably not so much about memory consuming but more about resource consuming. But be assured that most new options are easily turned off. Erik ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second. Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You. Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2 _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
