On Sun, 2012-04-22 at 11:02 +0000, Renk Thorsten wrote: > After the last related discussion, I've really been thinking a while if I > should bring this up again or not.
Let me just add to the discussion that 'technically perfect' always will look a tad odd to humans since the world around us is not perfect. It's the moment I added actuators (with delayed responses) to surface movements of the F-16 it did start to feel 'real' This discussion (and the one prior to this about flat ocean surface) is probably of the same magnitude; if the end result doesn't look obviously wrong it is probably just as good as a technically perfect solutions and might even feel more natural (because it's a bit imperfect like the world around us). Erik ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second. Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You. Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2 _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
