>  Out of interest, do you have it enabled by default now?  I'm interested to 
> know whether you consider
> the frame-rate hit acceptable for the extra eye-candy.

I don't fly that often these days, most of my time is spent on launching the 
747 and testing various things.
Don't need nice looking scenery for that, so I've everything disabled by 
default :-)

Just did another test, and the outcome is rather interesting I think. This time 
with the 747-400:
0.00 : 45
1.00 : 35
2.00 : 30

Looks as if the buildings have a high impact, until the framerates come within 
a certain range (around 25-30 fps).
Setting the density to 3 isn't significantly different from the fps at 2... Are 
the buildings "smart" and do they base 
their looks/density on the framerates?

Gijs
                                          
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to