Thorsten wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: Renk [mailto:thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi] > Sent: 06 September 2012 10:47 > To: FlightGear developers discussions > Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] license > > There remains this strange discrepancy between what people are outraged > about and what could potentially stand in court. >
snip > * violations of GPL because the source code is not really available. > > So we're really down from fraud to the availability of source code on a > website - and if FlightProSim would make all the code easily available by > simply cloning the Flightgear repositories, you'd all be happy because they > are now in complicance with GPL? Somehow I don't think so, somehow I > think this isn't what upsets people. > Even that is available, or used to be. I downloaded a copy, which AFAIKS was just our source code, despite their claims to have modified it. Qs you say - that's how it is. I think we ought to try to avoid having this discussion every 12 months or so, covering the same ground, and coming to exactly the same conclusion. Caveat emptor. Vivian ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
