> > I don't see how adding a flight planner, aircraft selection and other > > useful features is going to bloat the code so much that is runs like a > > snail. > > ..these should be _separate_ small programs, not one big ass binary. > And, yes, I agree these are useful, and they should be called from FG > as needed, and not carried as dead weight when they're not being used. > > ..take yasim and uiuc fdm's; If I don't use them, they should not be > loaded as the dead weigh part of the one big ass binary. They > should be stand-alone binaries precisely like jsbsim. If I use them, > I like fgfs to call yasim as needed. Etc.
Well, JSBSim _can_ be a standalone binary, but when integrated with Flightgear, _all_ of the FDMs (and other subsystems too as far as I know) are compiled and linked in to FlightGear as static libraries, I believe. Is that correct? Jon _______________________________________________ Flightgear-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
