> As I make my way down the list of so called "Flyable" planes, the only real > contender is the B1900D - quite disheartening - really how many Cessna's do > we really need?? and the rest - well they are too incomplete to fly!! > > Quite disappointing in fact. > You can forget about flying these: > > 737 Boeing 737 > 747 Boeing 747-400 (YASim) > 747-100 Boeing 747-100 (JSBSim) > A320 > > The others are mostly incomplete - anyone else find this as well? > > And pity the Citation - which is possessed.
Hi, Shelton: It's true that some of the aircraft are not well "shaken-down". I'm heads-down in serious coding, and have been for months. JSBSim is undergoing a major upgrade. One of the things I really want to do when that settles down is to evaluate our aircraft models and refine or cull the ones that don't fly well. Feedback from users is valuable. What really helps the project, though, is more specific information about what is wrong with a plane. Is it documentation? What seems wrong about an aircraft? If you could take a few moments to fill in some details, that would be a valuable contribution to our efforts. Thanks! Jon Berndt Development Coordinator JSBSim Project _______________________________________________ Flightgear-users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
