Hi > Just a quick comment. There's been a few people > chatting about how good/bad certain aircraft are with > respect to FDM's near the edge of the normal flight > envelope. I think its very difficult for a simulator > to get everything right all of the time. I fly a > number of different simulators (FlightGear, MSFS and > X-Plane). Even MSFS obviously gets it *very* wrong > from time to time. Now, I have never taken the > controls of a helicopter (although I have been a > passenger in one), but I'm fairly sure that with the > engine off it shouldn't cavort around in the air for > ages without loosing altitude, which is just what the > MS Jetranger does :-) > > I think, what I'm trying to say is, its all very well > to encourage people to strive for perfection in the > flight models, 3D cockpits, etc, but when they don't > quite reach it, don't beat them up about it, because > even the proprietary sims don't get it right all the > time :-)
I am very thanksfull to people who implement FGFS and the aircraft's. What , in my undrstanding, is the use of this topic is to have some info of wich aircraft did what in order to not confuse ourselfs trying to do with an airplane thinks that not implemented. regards Charalampos Alexopoulos _______________________________________________ Flightgear-users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
