Le vendredi 09 décembre 2005 à 18:02 +1000, Chris Wilkinson a écrit : > Hi there, > > Gerard ROBIN wrote: > > Again an other example which demonstrate the bad results with 3D > > Clouds. If we want to suit to reality, 2D is the only one solution. > > > > http://ghours.club.fr/Clouds-2D-3D.jpg > > Your screenshot is taken from below at a fairly tight FOV.
Oh sorry to come back again on the topic i did not take care of your remark about "fairly tight FOV" . Do you mean that between 90 and 100 is a tight FOV ? (the snapshot was 95) For a normal use i have 50 That snapshot covered a very large area SNIP > > Kind regards, > > Chris Wilkinson, Brisbane, Australia. > > Cheers -- Gerard _______________________________________________ Flightgear-users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
