Hi there,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Today's Topics:
3. Re: Re: Clouds 2D better than Clouds 3D (Gerard ROBIN)
(Gerard ROBIN)
Hi Gerard. The 2D shot is better in that instance because there
*are* some clouds. I wonder if the metar data in your location
is broken? I unplug DSL here due to frequent storms when not using
the PC, and if I forget to plug it back in before starting fgfs I
get the same with 3D clouds...
6. Re: Re: Clouds 2D better than Clouds 3D (Gerard ROBIN)
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
That skin is from a photo I took of an Air NZ B737 at NZCH. It is
available (email off-list), but it does need some touch-ups on the
cockpit area (left and right cockpit windows don't quite meet in
the middle... :-)
7. Re: Re: Clouds 2D better than Clouds 3D (Gerard ROBIN)
(Christian Mayer)
An Aussie? Nah mate, I'm a kiwi born and bred! Lived at NZCH for
the first 34 years of this life, and have only been in YBBN for
almost a year to earn better money to fund travel thru Europe and
elsewhere later. If cloud shadows and more 3D cloudtypes are put
into the next release of fgfs I might have to postpone some travel
to purchase a better gfx card...don't tell my girlfriend, she'll
remove important parts of my anatomy if she reads that! :-)
Kind regards,
Chris Wilkinson, Brisbane, Australia.
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
