first try failed because:
Reporting-MTA: dns; robin.bitstreet.net
Received-From-MTA: DNS; mp-217-214-241.daxnet.no
Arrival-Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 16:46:59 -0500
Final-Recipient: RFC822; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Actual-Recipient: RFC822; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Action: failed
Status: 5.3.0
Last-Attempt-Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 16:47:02 -0500
.chanching you meant to mail privately, I try again.
If you meant to post on a FG mail list, please forward
this message there too, for discussion completeness.
.second try failed:
Reporting-MTA: dns; robin.bitstreet.net
Received-From-MTA: DNS; mp-217-214-241.daxnet.no
Arrival-Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 18:01:11 -0500
.third...list admin, diagnosis ideas?
It works like some chafed piece of wire shorting:
Final-Recipient: RFC822; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Actual-Recipient: RFC822; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Action: failed
Status: 5.3.0
Last-Attempt-Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 18:01:15 -0500
The original message was received at Fri, 27 Jul 2001 04:40:42 +0200
from Lena.gasguru.ddts.org [127.0.0.1]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(reason: 550-See <URL:http://mail-abuse.org/dul/>)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
.. while talking to mail.sourceforge.net.:
>>> RCPT To:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<<< 550-See <URL:http://mail-abuse.org/dul/>
<<< 550 mail from 193.217.215.147 rejected: administrative prohibition
(host is blacklisted)
550 5.1.1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... User unknown
.now chanching you meant to post on a FG mail list,
I try again:
On Thu, 26 Jul 2001 14:20:06 -0500, Cameron Moore
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001.07.26 09:34]:
> > ...and it tests my .fetchmailrc and .procmailrc setup
> > on confusing messages, I expect it to land in my FG devel box. ;-)
>
> FYI, I filter off of the "Sender:" tag with procmail. Works like a
> charm. Thanks :-)
> --
> Cameron Moore
>
.myself, I also filter off the "Subject: " and then do a
body search, to cut up digests into its original messages.
Here, I use a 128 kB message id cache, or more.
.then, I plan to strip off html and other code, leaving the
plain text and returning the original message to the sender
automagically, advicing him and his sysadmins, they should
implement email security and stop spreading vira. ;-)
.the FG lists are okay, only a wee bit of flawed quoting,
and that to may be possible to fix with procmail.
.after that, digest (de)compression might be useful.
.the tricky part in my .fetchmailrc and .procmailrc setup,
is the syntax etc checks is too tolerant, as these do not
catch all my errors yet, so its trial and error.
.the reason I do this, is all the garbage we get in the
Gasification list @
http://www.crest.org/discussion/gasification/current/
.at this stage however, I am more interested in getting help
getting "airborne", so I subtly asked for help in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with subject
"./runfgfs -> Cannot locate FG root directory (data)",
in the FG-users mail lists.
.the fact I have design policy ideas, does not stop me
from having FG newbie problems. ;-)
--
.med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
Scenarios always come in sets of three:
best case, worst case, and just in case.
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-users
