Paul Richter wrote: > Well then, I'm sure that all the professional photographers and > thousands of spectators at Air Tattoo would be surprised to hear that > what they witnessed was nothing but a manipulated computer image... > > http://www.airsceneuk.org.uk/airshow05/riat05/partone/riat05.htm > http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=su26&w=65891259%40N00 > > > -Paul Richter > > --- Richard Bytheway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> <snip> >> >>> http://www.airsceneuk.org.uk/airshow05/riat05/partone/curtis.jpg >>> >>> That would be a challenge to model in AI... >>> >>> Cheers >>> Dene >>> NZWN >>> >> <snip> >> >> Photoshop - well done, but still fake. >> >> If the exposure is long enough to blur the background, then the >> propeller should be blurred too. Also the shadow looks odd. >> >> Richard >> >> >> > This is largely the discussion that went round work too... > Some of the points to come out of that... If the aperture was fast enough and the panning accurate enough, the blurring of the static points and the static propeller could be explained... It was commented at work; the shadows look funny
Make up your own mind.... I think rather than looking at the picture technically you have to ask your self...would you hold those poles under ANY circumstances? Dene NZWN ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-users
