Thank you for this demo as well ! Jo
2014-03-05 21:09 GMT+01:00 Chris Barker <[email protected]>: > On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Nouvelle Collection < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >>> no, I put the test in ScaledBitmapDemo, not ScaledBitmap2Demo. Not for >>> any particular reason. >> >> >> I looked into >> http://svn.wxwidgets.org/viewvc/wx/wxPython/3rdParty/FloatCanvas/Demos >> and I tried to get the files also with "svn co >> http://svn.wxwidgets.org/svn/wx/wxPython/3rdParty/FloatCanvas/FloatCanvas"; >> but in both cases, I couldn't fnd "ScaledBitmapDemo.py". Are you sure the >> file is on the SVN ? >> > > indeed you were right -- it wasn't there. It is now. > > > >> Are you using ScaledBitmap or ScaledBitmap2? ScaledBitmap2 is >>> more efficient if you are zooming in on the detail of a large image -- it >>> is smarter about only using the part of the image that is in view at the >>> time. Ideally, it should completely replace ScaledBitmap, but I don't hink >>> it works quite right if you use arbitrary projection functions so I've >>> kept both in place for now. >>> >> >> Ok! I've tried both, and both work. >> > > If you are mostly going to be seeing the entire image, or most of it, then > ScaledBitmap is probably a little faster. If you need to zoom in on just a > small piece of the image, then ScaledBitmap2 is better. > > -Chris > > > > -- > > Christopher Barker, Ph.D. > Oceanographer > > Emergency Response Division > NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice > 7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax > Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception > > [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > FloatCanvas mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.paulmcnett.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/floatcanvas > >
_______________________________________________ FloatCanvas mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.paulmcnett.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/floatcanvas
