Thanks guys. I solved the problem. I didn't realize the default rotation value 
was 15 minutes or so, therefore I thought no files were being created. 
Eventually I was able to see that all my captures were listening on their 
respective ports. There also seemed to be no output, because I was informed of 
the incorrect port that the routers were exporting on. All is well.


Quoting Mike Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> After you enter the flow-capture command, you can type
> 
> echo $?
> 
> And get the return code of the process.  If it's 0, all's well, if it's
> not, then there's a problem (this goes for anything, not just
> flow-capture.)
> 
> Also, weren't there some known issues with the redhat's flow-tools
> package?  If you have continued problems you could try getting the source
> directly from the flow-tools site and compiling it by hand.
> 
> Mike
> 
> On Apr 03 at 23:10, "Alex Shepard" wrote:
> 
> > flow-capture daemonizes itself by default.  Check your process table  
> > for the flow-capture process:
> > 
> > xenith:~ alexs$ sudo flow-capture -w flows 0/0/2056
> > xenith:~ alexs$ ps -ax |grep flow
> > 19580  ??  Ss     0:00.00 flow-capture -w flows 0/0/2056
> > 
> > Use the -D flag if you want flow-capture to run in the foreground  
> > (this is not very well documented, sorry).
> > 
> > That setsocketopt message is a red herring, it's just a report of  
> > some housekeeping data about the UDP socket it received from the  
> > operating system.
> > 
> > You could then run the flow-* utilities on the flow files that were  
> > captured and saved to your working directory (look for files starting  
> > with ft-v*, dumped every 15 minutes, or on intervals specified with  
> > the -n flag).
> > 
> > HTH,
> > alex
> > 
> > On Apr 3, 2006, at 10:37 PM, Matthew Heineke wrote:
> > 
> > >I checked /var/log/messages
> > >
> > >Apr  4 00:30:34 cumbia flow-capture[25701]: setsockopt(size=4194304)
> > >
> > >I changed the port number to something random and not 80, that got rid
> > >of a binding error (duh).
> > >
> > >any ideas on the setsockopt problem?
> > >
> > >>
> > >>On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 00:08 -0500, Matthew Heineke wrote:
> > >>>Hi I'm a student doing research with Netflow data exported from  
> > >>>one of
> > >>>Vanderbilt Universities subnets.
> > >>>
> > >>>I installed flow-tools from yum, on FC4.
> > >>>
> > >>>I've read the man pages and I'm getting started with capturing data.
> > >>>I want to capture data from any of the various routers we have
> > >>>configured to export to my server.
> > >>>
> > >>>I run this simple command :
> > >>>bash-3.00# flow-capture -w /home/heinekms/flows 0/0/80
> > >>>bash-3.00#
> > >>>
> > >>>As you can see it went back to the bash prompt immediately.
> > >>>flow-capture will complain if I don't provide a working directory  
> > >>>or the
> > >>>localip/remoteip/port. But it exits with amiable parameters. I'm not
> > >>>sure what my problem is.
> > >>>
> > >>>_______________________________________________
> > >>>Flow-tools mailing list
> > >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>>http://mailman.splintered.net/mailman/listinfo/flow-tools
> > >>
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >Flow-tools mailing list
> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >http://mailman.splintered.net/mailman/listinfo/flow-tools
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Flow-tools mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://mailman.splintered.net/mailman/listinfo/flow-tools
> 


-----------------------------------------------------------------
Heineke, Matthew Steven
Vanderbilt University
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Flow-tools mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.splintered.net/mailman/listinfo/flow-tools

Reply via email to