> Hi,
> It's better to enable ip route-cache on the bottle neck interface if you are 
> interested in trafic comming and going to internet.
> But if you want to monitor internal LAN trafic, you will be obliged to 
> activate ip route-cache on the LAN switch or all the other interfaces.
>  
> Cordially

Ok, I understand now.. How about in this setup:

  main_router  -------------------> edge_router ----------> Internet
   /      |      \
 /        |       \
/         |        \
if1     if2        if3

Where the main router is connected to the edge_router via a POS interface.. 
Then 
the main router has several interfaces(per subnet)

I'm collecting flows from the edge router... I want to monitor each 
interface/subnet on the
main_router.. Does this mean that I will have to make main_router an exporter 
too?? And also
enable router-cache flow on if1,2,3 of the main router? For this setup, I will 
be using JKFlow... Before
I was using CUFlow......

thanks..
 
>  
> From:  "Mark Jayson R. Alvarez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:  [Flow-tools] Per Interface netflow configuration question
> Date:  Tue, 13 Jun 2006 14:23:54 +0800
> >Hi,
> >
> >Suppose we have an edge router which only have one interface connected to the
> >Internet. Is it necesarry to enable ip route-cache flow on all other
> >interfaces as well or just on the bottle neck interface (since all traffic
> >will pass thru this interface)?
> >
> >Thanks
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Flow-tools mailing list
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >http://mailman.splintered.net/mailman/listinfo/flow-tools
> 
> MSN Messenger : appels gratuits de PC à PC partout dans le monde !  

-- 
_______________________________________________
Flow-tools mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.splintered.net/mailman/listinfo/flow-tools

Reply via email to