10.32.4.44 is a valid local interface. That is what makes this all so confusing... The interface is valid, the port I am exporting with is free, and because I am running flow-fanout as root, there should not be any issues with permissions.
> flow-fanout 10.45.68.38/0/8924 0/0/6301 10.32.4.44/162.48.52.59/6301 (...) > Aug 10 20:24:25 mopsnftemp flow-fanout[25656]: bind(xmit): Cannot assign requested address (...) > I have been running flow-fanout as root. As for the port already being > bound to another process, I don't think it is... Running netstat -an > confirms that there is no other process listening on the port I am tring > to use with flow-fanout... I am out of ideas here. I have no clue what > could be causing this problem. 'man flow-fanout' tells us that 10.32.4.44 'must be a valid local IP address." Do you have 10.32.4.44 assigned to a local interface? Everton -----Original Message----- From: Everton da Silva Marques [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 11:37 AM To: Wright, Brandt Cc: Volk,Gregory B; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Flow-tools] Trouble getting flow-fanout to work On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 11:22:19AM -0400, Wright, Brandt wrote: > flow-fanout 10.45.68.38/0/8924 0/0/6301 10.32.4.44/162.48.52.59/6301 (...) > Aug 10 20:24:25 mopsnftemp flow-fanout[25656]: bind(xmit): Cannot assign requested address (...) > I have been running flow-fanout as root. As for the port already being > bound to another process, I don't think it is... Running netstat -an > confirms that there is no other process listening on the port I am tring > to use with flow-fanout... I am out of ideas here. I have no clue what > could be causing this problem. 'man flow-fanout' tells us that 10.32.4.44 'must be a valid local IP address." Do you have 10.32.4.44 assigned to a local interface? Everton _______________________________________________ Flow-tools mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.splintered.net/mailman/listinfo/flow-tools
